Author Archives: Weinman on Wine

Champagne Grand Marque v Family Producers

Champagne

Grand Masque v Family Producers

A function of the

The Wine and Food Society of Western Australia

7 February 2010

The Champagne industry has been dominated for many years by the Grand Marque champagne houses. Producers like Pol Roger, Roederer, Moet and Krug are synonymous with fine champagne. To meet the massive demand for their wines, the Grand Marques purchase very large quantities of fruit from growers through-out the region.

Many of the growers also sell wine under their own labels. These wines have often been made by large co-operatives who return a portion of the finished wines to the growers to sell.

There is a growing trend for some fruit growers to actually make their own champagnes in-house. These family produced Champagnes are hand made in small quantities. This allows for a variety of styles to be produced. The quality of these wines can be very high and they can offer real value.

The aim of this tasting was to compare “Family” wines with the Grand Marques to see how they measured up. The results were fascinating. Each bracket of wines had a selection of both family and Grand Marque wines, and support was divided between the two. The wines that scored best had almost universal support from those attending.

To me the wine of the night was the Marc Hebrart! This delivered real excitement at a price that is unbeatable. In fact, it was the cheapest wine in the tasting at $46.20. Two other family wines that received significant support were the Lanais and the Gaston Chiquet. With the exception of the Launois ($59), most of the family wines were under $50 per bottle.

That most of the Grand Marques performed well is of no surprise. What was interesting was in the last bracket (Dom Perignon, Krug and Pol Roger 1999), most present preferred the Pol Roger! At less than half the price of the big guns, this must also represent a bargain! Importantly, there was no losers in this tasting, and I would be happy drinking any of the wines.

N.B. My tasting notes are a bit sparse, as I was also in the kitchen for this event.

Tasted

KrugGrand Cuvee – NV (18.8). Wow, turbo charged nose with ripe fruit and a complex yeasty note. The palate starts with an incredible explosion of rich fruit and is followed by great length and complexity. A powerful wine that is VERY long and seamless. Be patient.

Moet and Chandon Dom Perignon – 2000 (18.8). Very tight and closed. You can actually smell chardonnay fruit here. The palate is defined by the incredible length and complexity, but this is just a baby. Points mainly for potential. Give it 5 years.

Pol Roger – Vintage – 1999.(18.7). Fresher and more forward than the first two wines, but with wonderful balance to the citrus and brioche characters. This is seriously complex and long, but the creamy palate remains fine and delicate to the close. This is crying out for a few years in the cellar. At less than $100, this is an absolute bargain and a clear favourite on the night. (Tasted twice with similar results).

Pol Roger – Extra Cuvee de Reserve – NV (18.3). This wine was really alive. Fine, long, tight and fresh, yet with a degree of complexity and power. A lovely aperitif style now, or will develop more richness with bottle age.

Launois Grand CruBlanc de Blancs – 2004 (18.2). Quite distinctive on the nose. Long, tight and dry, with a lovely freshness. This is fine and very long. Just at the start of its life and worth a try.

Veuve Clicquot – Brut – NV (18). A richer wine than some in the tasting, this is complex and beautifully balanced. A lovely floral character runs through the wine, with some gentle spice to close.

Marc HebrartCuvee ReservePremier Cru – NV (17.9). More open and forward with floral fruit characters. The palate has lovely creamy fruit with a savoury finish. This is fine and long, and has crunchy granny smith apples to close. Very easy to drink and a real bargain!

BolingerSpecial Cuvee – NV (17.8). A richer style and very complex, with yeast and bread and lees all apparent on the nose. Creamy, textured and long on the palate, the finish is surprisingly dry and fresh. Not everyone’s style but suits me.

Voirin-Jumel – Blanc de Blanc – Grand Cru – NV (17.8). A touch more developed, with lees and richness. On the palate, it is the length of flavour that really stands out. The creamy fruit is complimented by fresh acid to close.

Tattinger – Brut – NV (17.7). This really suffered from being too cold. Once it warmed up a little, it really started to sing. Consistently good in recent tastings.

Laurent Perrier Brut LP – NV (17.5). Complex, with subtle yeast/lees characters on the nose. The palate is creamy and interesting, and whilst long, remains quite taught and linear in the mouth. Well balanced.

Henriet-Bazin – Blanc de Noirs – Brut Grand Cru – NV (17.3). The mousse was a little bigger to start. A bit more colour and quite complex. The nose has some nuttiness and lees characters. Fine and long, this is an enjoyable drink.

Raymond BoulardCuvee Reserve – Blanc de Noirs – Brut – NV (17.2). Lovely nose with a touch of developed characters, honey and apple. The palate is creamy but taught and appears to have a fairly low dosage. A blend of 70% pinot meunier and 30% pinot noir.

Gaston ChiquetBrut Tradition – NV (17). The nose was quite closed, but the palate was generous, textured and showing good acid balance. Not so complex now, and just a touch too foamy in the mouth. Should improve.

All the family wines were sourced from Ross Duke in Melbourne. Their contact details are:

Tel: (03) 9696 7920
Fax: (03) 9696 8703
E.mail: rdwc@frenchwinecentre.com
Website: www.frenchwinecentre.com

New Release – Sparkling and Friends

28 January 2010

An interesting tasting of wines with bubbles and a small bracket of Pinot Noir. The bracket of sparkling wines was very diverse, both in style and in grape variety. Champagne (wines from the Champagne region in France) can be made from three varieties – chardonnay, pinot noir and pinot meunier.

A wine only made from chardonnay is referred to as a Blanc de Blanc. As the name suggests, this is a white wine made from white (Green) grape varieties. A Blanc de Noir (white from black) is made only from the red (pinot) grape varieties.

A Rose can be made in two ways. One is to use a portion of base wine that has been left in contact with the skins of the red grapes to pick up some colour prior to vinification (wine making). The other is to add a little red wine to the blend at a later stage to add the required colour.

Wines from any region outside of the Champagne region are not allowed to use the name Champagne. Often, they are made in a similar fashion, but without the regulations imposed on the producers of Champagne. Several other production techniques are used at the bottom end of the market.

We included a small bracket of pinot noirs in the tasting as it almost matched the theme and they needed to be tried at some stage. The pinots really struggled in the tasting for two reasons. Firstly, they followed on from the sweet moscatos, which dulled our palates somewhat. Secondly. several of the wines were simply too young. The Stefano Lubiano in particular improved dramatically after being opened for a day.

Tasted

Silkwood – Pinot Noir – Premium – 2006 (17). Earthy nose showing some development. Touch of barnyard and sticking plaster. Ripe, but quite grippy and tight. Needs time to open and soften. Oak will integrate more in a year or two.

Jansz – Brut – LD – 2002 – NV (17*). Much finer than most here. Elegant, refined, balanced and poised. Long and silky palate. Quite buttery and developed. An interesting style.

Jansz – Brut – Premium Vintage Rose– 2006 (16.8*). Obvious Rose. Faint touch of berries. Refined, elegant, sophisticated and long. good texture and mouth feel. Builds.

Prince Laurent – Brut – Champagne – NV (16.8). More obvious champagne style on this. Very well made with some obvious lees characters. Very fine mousse. Tight and fresh, but not complex on the palate. Medium length.

Si – Moscato – Sparkling – NV (16.7). Grapey fruit, musk and spice. The palate is vibrant, sexy and lots of fun. Good acidity to close. Not complex or serious but hard to resist. A fair bit of residual sugar makes this a good option on a warm afternoon.

Jansz – Brut – Premium Non Vintage Rose – NV (16.5). Not my style, but received good support from the rest of the panel. Good length and mouth feel.

Leon Palais – Brut – Blanc de Blanc – NV (16.5). Hard work to start due to restrained style. Apple and creamy lemon to the fore on a lively palate. Some complexity evident. Very good value at under $15. (This is not from the Champagne region).

Preveli – Brut – Blanc de Noir – 2006 (16.5). Orange hue reflects the fact that this is made from pinot. Richer and more obvious than some others, with rich peachy fruit and some developed caramel. Good acid and a touch of residual sugar to add balance. Granny smith apples to close

Non Vintage Champagne

“A Mouth Full of Joy”

18 November 2009 – Lamont’s Cottesloe

I was lucky enough to attend the “Mouth Full of Joy” tasting at Lamont’s in Cottesloe the other day. I don’t know if John Jens coined the phrase or if he heard it somewhere else, but when he suggested that Champagne should taste like a “mouthful of joy”, I felt that this summed up quality champagne perfectly.

It stands to reason that the better the wine, the more joy it brings, and this tasting gave me the opportunity to taste many of the better known wines on the market. I was interested to see whether reputation and price were reflected in the absolute quality of the wines.

So how did they look?

The big winner was the Pol Gesner NV. This is a direct import by BWS (Woolworths) and has performed consistently in my tastings over the last couple of years. This was the equal of many wines in the tasting, but is available for as little as $33 dollars in dozen buys.

It was not surprising that Pol Roger, Veuve, Roederer etc. performed well, nor was it a surprise that Moet was quite mediocre.

On a side-bar, it is worth getting on to the Lamont’s mailing list, as they have the best line up of tastings in Perth at present.

Results

Louis Roederer – Brut Premier – NV (18.6). Lifted, bright and racy. The nose had floral characters, lemon, fresh bread and a touch of toast. The palate was creamy, fine, fresh and vibrant with grapefruit to close. Not showing the greatest complexity, but a delightful aperitif wine. This is my style of wine.

Pol Roger – Vintage – 1999 (18.5++). Wow, this is special. Opens with complex brioche and citrus characters, but appears quite closed. The palate is super fine and tight and is defined by powerful fruit with excellent length. Lemony acid to close. This will get even higher marks in a couple of years (the 1990 is sensational now). As with the entire Pol Roger range, this represents great value!

Pol Roger – Extra Cuvee de Reserve – NV (18.5). Bigger and more complex than most here. Very fine mousse and nose. This is very fine and elegant, but has a degree of richness and depth that makes it stand out. Lovely mouth feel and persistence.

Pol Gessner – NV (18.5). Lovely colour and very fine mousse. The nose is complex with yeasty/brioche notes, but retains enough freshness to keep it really interesting. The palate is complex, rich and round, with a very fine finish. Excellent length and mouth feel, with racy acidity to close. This is an absolute bargain at under $35 from BWS.

Gossett – Brut – NV (18.5). This is rich, complex and very long. Lovely almond meal and fresh brioche. A complete wine that is seamless from front to back.

Veuve Cliquot – Brut – NV (18.4). Creamy and complex nose with a fine mouse and elegant nose. The palate was zesty, big, rich long and fine. The texture and mouth feel were great. Very persistent. A lovely wine.

Tattinger – Brut – NV (18). A touch more colour than some here. This also had more honey characters and some mushroom/forest floor notes. The palate is developed, honeyed, round and long. Builds in the mouth to a very satisfying finish. Finer than I expected.

Bollinger – Special Cuvee – NV (18). This was a more forward fruit driven style. The fruit is a bit simple right now and it is a touch foamy in the mouth, but the fruit was clean and fresh, with good length and persistence. Opened in the glass and built power. The balance of the wine stood out. I expect this to improve in the short term.

Laurent Perrier – Brut LP – NV (17.6). Citrus and brioche dominate the very fine mousse. There is also a slight toastyness and mealy character. The palate is richer and broader than some here, but lacks the length of the best.

Moet & Chandon – NV (17). The darkest of all the wines here. A fine mousse, but not revealing a lot on the nose. The palate is creamy and quite rich and builds intensity. Lacks the depth of flavour or freshness of the best here. Easy drinking (I wonder if this is a pinot dominant blend?).

Piper Heidsieck – NV (16.9). This is a lighter style that appeared a bit young. The mousse was a little coarse, and it was a bit foamy in the mouth. Simple clean and fresh with no rough edges. Value at $33 from Vintage Cellars.

Sparkling Wines

15th November 2009

In the lead up to Christmas and the summer heat, I am always on the look out for good quality sparkling wines to drink over the season. I have to admit that I am a fan of Champagne (the French stuff) and drink very little Australian sparkling. This relates to the fact that Champagne is one wine style where the new world has yet to equal the original.

Australia makes cabernet and shiraz based wines that are the equal of the best in the world (perhaps in a different style though). The best Australian sparkling wines now approach the NV French wines in price, but do they match on quality?

The wines reviewed represent both some well known brands and some new releases. I was pleased with the overall quality, and the top wines definitely represent excellent value.

Reviewed

Deviation Road – Pinot Noir/Chardonnay – Brut – 2008 (17.5). More interesting and complex than most here, with fine apple fruit and subtle brioche and yeast. The palate is fine, delicate, elegant and refreshing. Good fruit and excellent balance. Not hugely complex, but good drinking. May develop in the short term. (With a RRP of $28.50 from the winery, this represents good value.)

Marri Wood Park EstateGrandis – Chenin – Brut Reserve – 2007 (17.5). This wine is obviously different, and reflects the loire style of sparkling chenin blanc. Powerful nose with lemon, sherbet, talc and perfume. Complex and very long palate with serious fruit and a lovely mouth feel. Definitely something to try this summer. ($25 ex winery).

Wolf Blass – Pinot Noir/Chardonnay – Brut – Gold Label – 2006 (17.3). Some developed toastiness with a touch of honey. The palate is fine, elegant, quite complex and long. The honeyed character is there again on the finish. Enjoyable and sure to be good value.

Croser – Pinot Noir/Chardonnay – Brut – 2006 (16.9). A very fine wine that presents completely closed at present. This is clean and fresh but needs a few years to develop complexity and higher points. (Was certainly better the next night.)

Brown Brothers – Pinot Noir/Chardonnay – Brut – Patricia – 2004 (16.8). Brioche, toast and autolysis dominate the nose which is quite creamy. The palate is developed, generous and round. The acid builds on the close to add freshness.

Cosham – Pinot Noir – Brut – 2004 (16.8). Very developed colour and very fine mousse. The nose has developed still wine fruit characters. The palate is soft, round and developed. The mouth-feel and aftertaste are harmonious and there is enough acid to keep it fresh. An interesting style that is worth trying with food.

Pirie – Chardonnay/Pinot Noir – Brut – NV (16.6). Some obvious toast and yeasty characters lead the nose. The palate is rich but not quite together yet. A broad and powerful style. Challenging.

Kiss Chasey – Brut – Sparkling Pink – NV (16.5). Lifted fruit in the strawberry spectrum. Long and savoury, but without great complexity. Good value at under $15.

Shiraz Blends

5 December 2010

An interesting tasting, with several interesting wines. The Stirling was a highlight, but the wines from Kaleske and Sons of Eden delivered real drinking pleasure. A relatively high number of wines did not get reviewed (points less than 16).

Reviewed

Ferngrove – Cabernet/Shiraz – The Stirling – 2007 (18+). Wow. Cedar and spice to the fore. There is mint, eucalypt and a rich seam of blackcurrant on the nose. The touch of peperriness attests to the shiraz component. The palate is powerful yet very refined. This is a big wine, and the fruit is overwhelmed by the structure now. There is menthol and satsuma plum on the finish. Needs 5 years but will live for 20. Different style to the Majestic.

Sons of Eden – Grenache/Shiraz/Moved – Kennedy – 2008 (17.8). Intriguing nose. This is fresh and juicy. The palate is dense and chock full of high quality, juicy fruit. There is licorice and plum, as well as some savoury notes. The oak is very much in the background and the length is impressive. The finish is very fine and silky, bordering on seamless. Great drinking over the next 5 years.

Kalleske – Grenache/Shiraz/Mouvedre – Clarry’s – 2009 (17.7). More restrained, this has dense and concentrated fruit. The palate is a real step up in quality compared to some. There is ripe yet restrained plum and dark berry fruit, with a touch of earthy, forest floor characters. The finish is fresh and bright. A good each way bet.

Deepwoods – Cabernet Sauvignon/Shiraz – Ebony – 2009 (17). Fresh and clean with mulberry and spice. There is plenty of vibrant fruit on the palate with enough acidity to make the finish refreshing. This is not so complicated, but is fleshy and enjoyable now.

Deepwoods – Rose – Harmony – 2010 (16.8). More savoury, this has obvious red berry fruit characters (raspberry jube). The palate is surprisingly delicate, dry and savoury with a tangy finish. A serious style that would carry food.

Aramis – Shiraz/Cabernet – 2008 (16.5). Softer and more subdued. There is ripe plummy fruit, but there is a lack of vibrancy. Good to drink though.

Devils Lair – Shiraz/Cabernet Sauvignon/Merlot/Cabernet Franc – Fifth Leg – 2008 (16.4). Fresh and vibrant. There are peppery shiraz notes with plummy fruit. There is a touch of mint on a chalky finish. Easy to drink.

Angove – Shiraz/Cabernet – Butterfly Ridge – 2009 (16). This again has some heavy fruit. There are plummy notes on the nose. This is juicy, but without pretence. Easy to drink.

Angove – Shiraz/Cabernet – Organic – 2009 (16). More support from other panel members. Cooler cabernet fruit to open with some grassy and herbal notes. There is a touch of sweet and sour fruit on the palate. Inoffensive and worth a look if organic is your thing.

Moondah Brook – Rose – Cabernet – 2010 (16). Vibrant colour. Fragrant and floral nose, this is very pretty. The strawberry fruit is the main feature, with a fair bit of residual sugar. Savoury notes on the finish keep it fresh.

Shiraz and Grenache

New Release Tasting

Reviewed: 30 March 2013

The highlight of this tasting was not the smart shiraz on display, but a pair of wines made from straight grenache. The Angove was fresh, succulent and juicy, whilst the Patritti was a powerhouse of old vines fruit. Different in style, but both most worthy of your attention.

Reviewed

Grenache and Blends

Patritti – Grenache – Section 181 – 2011 (18+). Fragrant, perfumed nose that is the trademark of grenache. Cherry, plum and red berries caress the nose, with subtle spice and cedary oak adding depth and complexity. The palate is flooded with masses of ripe fruit, is fresh, and is totally delicious. The tannins and oak add depth to the fruit rather than dominate it. After a couple of days in the bottle, this was even better, with superb, old bush vine fruit on display. A superb wine. ($28 ex-winery and sealed with a cork).

Angove – Grenache – Alternatus – 2012 (17.5+). Fabulous youthful fruit, and very new-world compared to the Chalk Board. On the nose, this has dense, ripe fruit over sweet oak characters. This is quite a big wine that has bucket loads of juicy ripe fruit over supple oak and fine tannins. Good length, with the flavour profile evolving to blackberry and spice. A smart wine that needs time to really come together. Best in 3- 5 years, but an excellent drink now with air.

Chalk Board – Grenache/Shiraz – Cotes du Rhone – 2011 (17). Light and fresh fruit that is bright and succulent, with a core of souring, black cherry characters. Whilst the fine tannins are noticeable, this is a fruit driven style that has seen little or no oak. Would suit food well and may even improve for a few years in bottle. (Vintage Cellars).

Shingleback – Grenache/Shiraz/Mouvedre – Red Knot – 2012 (17). Plump, ripe, supple and delicious. Not overly complex, but with good quality fruit, the finish is defined by fine tannins and acid, making this an excellent food wine.

Shiraz

Leeuwin Estate – Shiraz – Art Series – 2010 (18). Much cooler style here, with peppery, spicy fruit and refined, fine tannins. The fruit quality is excellent, as is the winemaking. The oak use is particularly note-worthy as it complements the style perfectly without imparting a flavour profile of its own. A refined wine that will be at its best after 2020.

Chalk Board – Shiraz – 2010 (17.5). Quite a serious wine that is tight, taut and closed. The fruit is fine and of good quality, while the winemaking matches the weight of the fruit very well. Supple, fine grained oak complements the fruit. Opens to show lovely red fruits and a touch of cinnamon spice. The chewy and dense finish suggests some time in bottle will be of benefit. Value from Vintage Cellars.

Patritti – Shiraz – Lot Three – 2010 (18). Masses of rich McLaren Vale (older vine) fruit on display here. There is ripe, plump fruit on the nose which is the main focus here, with the winemaking just adding support in the background. The finish is quite textured, though the silky tannins are very fine and add a drying savoury edge to the palate. An enjoyable wine that is well suited to food, though it will benefit from time in the cellar. It was interesting to see distinct espresso coffee characters develop on both the nose and the palate. $28 from the cellar door.

N.B.The espresso characters were even more obvious on Patritti’s top of the range JPB shiraz (Not reviewed here).

Faber Vineyard

New Release Tasting

Reviewed: 15 February 2012

John Griffith established Faber in 1997 after working with several wineries (including Houghton for 6 years) and a stint teaching winemaking at Curtin University.

The most interesting facet of the Faber story is that the first vines were only planted in 1997. At a time when there is a lot of cache given to old-vines shiraz, the Faber wines highlight that old vines are not the only ingredient required to make great wine. Rightly, the Reserve shiraz is considered to be amongst WA’s finest.

Looking through the new releases from Faber, I was impressed at how each individual wine was handled to maximise enjoyment. While John is a champion of Swan Valley shiraz, he draws on grapes from several premium regions to fashion other wines in the range.

There is no doubt in my mind that the Faber Reserve shiraz is a superb wine. Having said that, the other wines that I have reviewed here are worthy of attention.

Reviewed

Faber Vineyard – Malbec – Dwellingup Vineyard – 2011 (17). The colour is almost crimson/purple. This is very deep smelling, with blueberry and raspberry over mint, with briary, earthy undertones. The souring finish adds life, though there is a touch of astringency on the close (that softens noticeably with air). This wine has excellent quality fruit that has been massaged in the winery, resulting in a pretty wine that is full of subtlety.

Faber Vineyard – Petit Verdot – 2011 (17.5). Attractive, forward nose that shows very pretty ripe fruit and well-handled oak. The palate, on the other hand, is quite firm and tannic, with plum and mulberry jam components showing through. After a day on the tasting bench, this really softened, allowing the pretty, fragrant fruit to shine. Whilst ideal for lovers of a big red now, this will be much better with a few years in the cellar. Diam closure.

Faber Vineyard – Shiraz – Riche – 2011 (17.5). Rich and dense red/black fruit with a touch of fruit-cake, menthol and spice. The wafts of sweet, cedary oak compliments the style very well. On the palate, the textured, drying tannins from fruit and oak are the main feature initially. With air, the dense, rich shiraz fruit shines through. This is almost inky in the mouth. A rich shiraz that deserves time in the cellar. Made in the Saignee method where some of the lighter juice is bled from the top of the vat to concentrate the flavours.

Faber Vineyard – Shiraz – Reserve – 2010 (18 – 18.5+). There is lovely fruit on show here, with dense, ripe berries over cocoa and coffee aromas. There is also a slightly resinous character from the oak, though this will settle with time in the bottle. The palate is superb, with white pepper over dense, dark fruit characters. One on hand, this is immensely powerful, yet on the other hand, balanced and lithe. The essence-like fruit and spice speaks to the quality of the superb Swan Valley fruit used to make this wine. Sour plum and spice on the finish really add to the mouth-feel and texture. A superb wine with a long future. Cork closure.

Shiraz – New Release

Reviewed 17 January 2012

A short, sharp tasting resulting in some excellent wines. None more so than the Windy Peak. I would like to try this again as the panel was unanimous in their praise. At $14 or less, it is a great bargain.

Ultimately though, my wine of the tasting is the Forester Estate. Whilst good now, it will be even better in a few years.

Reviewed

Forester Estate – Shiraz – 2009 (17.8+). Mulberry, mint and eucalypt on both the nose and palate that speak to this wine’s Margaret River heritage. The medium weight, succulent fruit has been skilfully combined with sympathetic winemaking. The result is a supple, almost fragrant wine with no rough edges. With air this develops a touch of opulence with licorice and a soft, lingering savouriness. This is a smart wine that deserves medium term cellaring and is great value at around $20.

De Bortoli – Shiraz – Windy Peak – 2012 (17.8). Souring fruit that hints at Satsuma plum and fresh cherry. On the palate there is masses of peppery fruit over cherry and souring acidity that really adds life. Textured and fine, this is a very well made wine. Long and supple, the tannins are fine while the oak only provides support. If you can hold on for a year or two to allow everything to settle, this will be a superb drink. At $14, it is a tremendous bargain.

Juniper Estate – Shiraz – 2009 (17.3). Dense, cooler region fruit here with a core of medium-bodied mulberry and plum fruit. Long and savoury in the mouth, this is a smart wine. Medium-bodied and supple, the acid and tannins shut down the palate, but this should evolve with time in the cellar or a bit of air in the glass.

Evans and Tate – Shiraz – Metricup Road – 2010 (17.2). Lighter, fresher fruit than the Riche shiraz from Faber. Bright plum and cinnamon spice characters with juicy, supple fruit flooding the palate. The tannins are ripe and soft, while the oak provides good support. There is a touch of licorice and tannin grip to close. An excellent mid-tier wine for early/mid-term consumption.

Killerby – Shiraz – 2010 (16.8/17.5). Soy sauce, sweet and sour and herbal notes stamp this as a cool climate shiraz. The palate is dense and textured, and obviously expensively made. There are hints of plum cake to close. The question is whether there is enough generosity to the fruit to make this good drinking now. Certainly, it will be all the better for 5 years+ in the cellar.

Shiraz – New Release

Reviewed: 1 January 2013

What is not to like about shiraz? There were some excellent wines on display from quite diverse regions.

The wines from Mount Pleasant are worth a mention due to the old-vines fruit that is used to make these. These wines must surely be some of the best value old-vines shiraz available.

The big surprise for me was just how good the Ad Hoc shiraz is. This is one of Larry Cherubino’s brands and it is excellent value.

Reviewed

Mount Pleasant – Shiraz – Maurice O’Shea – 2010 (18 – 18.5). Beautifully ripe, yet fragrant fruit on the nose. There is tremendous concentration of fruit on the palate, with the fruit soaking up the high quality oak. In the glass, this became inky and developed chocolate-like fruit aromas. Long and savoury, this is an elegant wine of charm. Needs 5 – 10 years to really hit its straps.

Mount Pleasant – Shiraz – Old Paddock and Old Hill – 2010 (18+). A smart wine that has lovely up-front fruit though the whole package is very subdued at first. The fruit and oak quality are excellent and this is a wine of great potential. The next day, this was a revelation! High quality fruit and oak combine to make a complex wine of real potential.

Cherubino – Shiraz – Laissez Faire – Syrah – 2011 (18). Opens with dense plumy fruit, spice (cloves) and sweet oak highlights. There is white pepper to the fore on a palate that is lean and savoury, making this ideally suited to food. Builds depth on the very long finish and is likely to improve for many years. A smart modern wine.

The Lane – Shiraz – Block 5 – 2011 (17.8). Sweet, floral fruit with a touch of vanillin oak and even candy. This also shows really spicy white pepper. The palate is full of white pepper, with floral highlight and licorice on the close. Dense fruit and fine tannins, with souring acidity to hold it all together. A modern, cool-area wine.

Ad Hoc – Shiraz – Middle of Everywhere – 2011 (17.7). Closed at first on the nose but develops ripe berries with air. The palate is dense and chocolaty, with bitter almonds to close. This is quite savoury on the finish really. A smart wine but really needs another 5+ years as the very fine tannins are surprisingly firm on the finish. A modern, complex wine with superb length. A remarkable wine given that this is well down the pecking order in the Cherubino line-up.

Grant Burge – Shiraz – Balthasar – 2008 (17.5+). Lovely sweet fruit with a touch of cedar and spice on the nose. The palate shows licorice, mulberry, blueberry and pepper. Long, the fruit is a touch linear now, but this will evolve with time and there is nice texture to close. With air, this opens to show plum fruits and becomes really good drinking. (I rated this very highly, though some felt that the hot vintage produced a wine with very ripe fruit characters).

Yerring Station – Shiraz/Viognier – 2010 (17.5). Earthy aromas and flavours here. Dense, ripe fruit of very high quality that is quite restrained. With air, the wine develops coffee, tar and chocolate characters. The finish is very long, if a touch sturdy now. Give it 5 years.

Mount Pleasant – Shiraz – Rosehill – 2010 (17). Attractive berry fruit with pepper and a touch of savoury soy characters. Compared to its big brothers this is not that long or dense, but this is, however, an easy drinking red that has lovely mouth-feel and fruit.

West Cape Howe – Shiraz – 2011 (17). An attractive wine that has quite soft, forward and ripe fruit and nice grip on the finish. Medium-bodied and spicy, the fruit really opens up on the finish and is complemented by a touch of savoury oak and fine tannins. European in style and a lovely drink now or in five to ten years.

Shiraz Master Class

Reviewed: 12 November 2012

Hosted by Sam Badger (Sommelier’s Australia) and Rockpool Bar and Grill – Perth

Shiraz is the great all-rounder of red wine. Grown in cooler climates, it produces wonderfully fragrant, almost perfumed wines that are full of spicy, peppery fruit. In warmer regions, the density of the fruit increases and the flavour profile moves from pepper and spice to red berries and plum. Both styles can produce wines of the highest quality, giving the consumer the choice of which style to drink.

Given the variety of styles on offer, there are wines made from shiraz that will suit almost any palate. The important point here is that the wine must taste good to the person who is about to drink it. When it comes to a collection of wine industry insiders, the focus can be on the technical aspects of the wine rather than drinking enjoyment.

I try to balance this by giving drinkability the attention that it deserves. I try to differentiate between consumer-friendly wines that are great drinking now and those for the connoisseur who has the ability to cellar wines for extended periods. A good example of this is the wine by Chave.

Here is a wine that polarised the assembled tasters. The old fashioned, earthy, leathery, herbal notes strongly suggested that this wine has a bit of brettanomyces. One of the tasters declared that the wine was faulty. But wine is a very personal experience and individual response to brett is varied. There is now doubt that there is a threshold above which the wine becomes less palatable, but this varies from one person to the next.

Anyone who grew up drinking old Hunter Valley reds will have fond memories of those leathery, horsy characters. And, yes, the Chave has plenty of these characters. While the wine is a long way removed from the modern, fresh Australian wines, it is not without interest or charm. My view is let the consumer decide.

Let me know your thoughts!

A special thanks goes out to Rockpool for hosting this event.

Reviewed

Jim Barry – Shiraz – The Armah – 2007. (18.5+). Chocolate, coffee, licorice, tar, earthy notes and sour plum all vie for attention on the nose. The palate is immense and powerful, yet remarkably, remains balanced and fine. The tannins are expertly handled and the fruit really builds on the finish. The oak has been swallowed up by the high quality fruit, imparting gentle texture rather than overt flavour. Plump, ripe and delicious, this develops coffee and licorice on the palate too as it evolves and builds. A highlight.

S.C. Pannell – Shiraz – 2008 (18/18.5+). Attention grabbing nose that blends ripe, fragrant fruit with quality winemaking inputs. Supple, the palate is initially textured up front, though the oak and tannins really shut down the finish. Licorice, plum, tar and chewy (drying) tannins all build on a very long palate. Immense fruit that needs time to unwind from the winemaker’s cocoon. Spectacular!

Te Mata Estate – Shiraz – Bullnose – 2010 (18.5). Austere and firm, this is very unrewarding at present. The closed nose only hints at what lies ahead. The palate is firm, yet the texture and tannins are very well judged. Opens to show mulberry, plum, licorice, spice and high quality oak. There are very firm, yet incredibly fine tannins to close. Ideally, this needs years to come around.

Shaw and Smith – Shiraz – 2009 (18.3). This wine stood out for its blend of high quality fruit and slick winemaking. Whilst powerful, the wine has lovely poise and balance. The finish is chewy and dense, yet there is vitality to the fruit that is captivating. Souring acidity adds life, the length is superb and the balance spot on. Beautifully made, this will live for many years.

Clonakilla – Shiraz/Viognier – 2010 (18.2). Cooler fruit on display here. Lovely spicy fruit on the palate with raspberry and cherry fruit over musk/Turkish delight highlights. Violets, perfume, white pepper, silky texture, near seamless palate, this has it all. The length is excellent and, with air, this really builds depth on the palate. Cracking cool climate shiraz, with the viognier adding a real lift.

Frankland Estate – Isolation Ridge Vineyard – 2009 (18 – 18.5). Lovely ripe fruit showing perfume over floral blueberry and plum. The palate is dense, with the sweet fruit complemented by dense, almost earthy characters. The palate is near seamless, the length prodigious. The finish is silky and the tannins are beautifully polished, adding grip along with the vanillin oak on the finish. Needs ten years to open up and will last for many more.

Henschke – Shiraz – Hill of Grace – 2006 (18 – 18.5+). Lifted fruit over sweet vanillin oak. A heady mix of red fruits over menthol and subtle spice. The palate is powerful and ripe, with tight oak and chewy tannins. There is fantastic length, souring acid and a very textured palate. This is a wine that has had the volume turned right up and the quality fruit builds with air. A clear favourite with some attendees.

Rene Rostaing – Cote Rotie – 2007 (18+). An interesting wine that is noticeably different. Leads off with herbal aromas over cherry and Satsuma plum. On the palate, it is apparent that this wine is more about texture than primary fruit. There is excellent length and depth to the wine, but the fruit is gentle. White pepper, fine tannins and herbal notes carry the finish, with lovely souring acid. The oak is apparent but sympathetic to the style. Really builds with air to show red currents, chocolate and spice and there is real density and depth of flavour.

Yves Cuilleron – Syrah – Cote Rotie – 2010 (18+). Balanced and enticing nose full of supple fruit with hints of savoury complexity. Builds to show black fruits, spice and a touch of anise. With really bright red fruits over white pepper on the palate, this is juicy, succulent and very long. The fine tannins and oak on the finish suggest that this will develop well, but this is so delicious, I would recommend trying a bottle now.

Clape – Shiraz – Cornas – 2009 (18). Ripe and fragrant fruit that, whilst full and dense, has lovely perfume and spice. Pepper, red fruits and spice all meld together with fine oak and a hint of licorice/herbal notes. With air, the wine opens up to show cherries and blueberries. The palate has lively white pepper and fine, though palpable tannins from the fruit and oak. The finish has cedary overtones, is very long, and has dusty tannins to close. A youthful and vibrant old-world shiraz.

J.L. Chave – Shiraz – Hermitage – 2006 (17/18+). A touch more ripe fruit characters here, with hints of fruitcake. There is lovely depth to the nose with aniseed, plum and earthy, forest floor, leathery characters. The palate is very fine, yet rich and textured. The bright fruit is the focus here, with the silky tannins and oak only making their presence felt on a very long finish. (The oak is all about texture rather than flavour and the tannins are really fine). The length is a stand-out. Elegant, medium-bodied and starting to show the first signs of development, you will either love or loath the earthy, forest floor characters. I am a fan!

Brokenwood – Shiraz – Hunter Valley – 2009 (17.8). Yes, this is a big wine, yet it is remarkably elegant and reserved. The souring acidity on the finish adds life and interest, though ideally, this needs a good steak to bring out its best, as it is dense, tight and restrained. The oak is a little obvious now, but will settle in time.

Greenstone – Shiraz – 2009 (17.5 – 18). Lovely nose that blends ripe, succulent fruit with savoury hints and a touch of oak lift. With red fruits to the fore, the palate is remarkable for the fruit-dominant mouth-feel. The structure builds with air. A well-made wine from Heathcote.

Sadie– Shiraz/Mouvedre – Columella– Liberatus in Castro Bonae Spei – 2008 (17.5 – 18). Dense, peppery fruit of some class. Rich and textured, this is a meal in itself. Dense, long and textured, there is weighty, dark fruits, tar, anise, spice and black pepper. There are savoury oak notes and chewy tannins to close. Some thought it just lacked a bit of life, but I thought it was spot on. From South Africa.

Chapoutier – Crozes Hermitage – Les Meyoniers – 2007 (17.5+). I like this a lot. Supple, floral fruit to the fore, showing spice, black pepper, plum, licorice, tar and earthy hints. The oak here is merely a whisper on the finish and the souring acidity carries the palate. Youthful and relatively uncomplicated now, this is a wine to drink or keep.

Pierre Gaillard – St Joseph – 2009 (17.5). Impenetrable nose. This is very closed and tight. The palate is, again, lighter bodied and very fresh, with cherry fruit to the fore over white pepper and spice. Excellent length and texture, the mouth-feel is the key here. Drink now to 10 years.